Different degrees of stickiness might be something to investigate. For example, post-it notes (in addition to having a kind of comical story of invention) are not sticky in the same way that candy or honey is sticky. The "trail" left by each type seem to be markedly different.
Commodities, fetishes, souvenirs, relics, rubbish. What theories help us think about things? In this course we will read Victorian travelers on West African "fetish," Michael Taussig on his imagined cocaine museum, Susan Stewart on longing and souvenirs, Freud on shiny noses, Marx on tables, Annette Weiner on the similarities between gift and commodity exchange, Mary Douglas on dirt, D.W. Winnicott on string, and Arjun Appadurai on the idea of the social lives of things. The singularization of things, the ways in which history and memory are stored in real and imagined objects, the commodification of the human body, the animation of the inanimate, utopian recycling, gleaning, found objects as art and craft: we will consider a broad range of theoretical issues in our readings and in projects that put them to quirky use.
1 comment:
Different degrees of stickiness might be something to investigate. For example, post-it notes (in addition to having a kind of comical story of invention) are not sticky in the same way that candy or honey is sticky. The "trail" left by each type seem to be markedly different.
--Nicole
Post a Comment